My own thing

I’m glad I’ve finally got round to writing this post as I was greeted by this literary quote when I loaded iGoogle:

"Siempre imaginé que el Paraíso sería algún tipo de biblioteca." "I have always imagined that Paradise will be a kind of library" - Jorge Luis Borges (Argentinian writer)

It was quite apt as this was on MSN:

Most beautiful library

Paul Bernhardt/Lonely Planet
Looking down at the interior of the Real Gabinete Portugues de Leitura, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil. Built in 1837, it's home to more than 350,000 works, many dating back to the 16th century.

I’ve had a quite a few flattering remarks from Cam23 bloggers saying how much they like my writing and that I should carry on, so here I am! Thank you Emma, Jenni, Celine, Helen and Libgeek, this is because of you. I expect it will be more sporadic than before, but I’ll definitely be blogging about our library video when it’s ready and I will embed the YouTube version into the blog post. We filmed the last scene the other day. I’m afraid I can’t reveal any more than I already have done on my @judgesarah Twitter feed, but if you click here, courtesy of Kirsty, you’ll find a rather amusing taster. Warning, it contains Andy’s knees.

Before I get started on the thing that inspired this post, a few updates. I’ve finally realised I can change the settings of my JournoTwit page. Of course it’s now purple! JournoTwit was recommended to me as it’s a brilliant website which consolidates all my Twitter information, making it a lot easier to see new tweets, including when someone mentions me. I’ve got columns for my favourite people, BBC news and the Cam23 chatter.

Okay, onto the reason why I’m here writing this. There may not be any more things to analyse, but here is an analysis of my own thing, hence the title. I was one of the librarians who went to the Central Library tour and I was sufficiently struck by what I saw to give me enough material to write about. It was over a week ago now, but a little distance only helps you to gain perspective. Something I wish people would understand sometimes.

I love the quote over the entrance; unfortunately it wasn’t there when we visited. It’s probably incredibly uncool to admit it, but I was a library kid and I'm proud of it. I have very fond memories of the old library. I was in there every Saturday and I thank my parents for encouraging my love of reading, learning and particularly books. I used to have to use my parents’ cards as well as my own because I wanted to take out so many books. I used to browse the shelves and then when I found a book, I sat on the floor and read it there and then. I used to watch the people walk by in Lion Yard below and spend hours there just loving the whole essence of the place; you’d have to drag me away.

What changed? Well the library shut, for four years. In the time it took to renovate the place, with the Grand Arcade growing around it, the technological advances and the endless problems (such as not factoring the weight of the books in so the building sank, that may just be a fabulous rumour though), I learned to live without it. Plus I still had the little library in the village where I live. Since it reopened, I’d only been in once before the tour and that was to while away half an hour or so. I just stayed in the foyer looking at the ‘quick picks’. So a tour was most welcome and I hoped that it would bring back some of the enthusiasm I used to have for the place. Unfortunately it wasn’t to be the case, but it may not have been the library’s fault, or our guide’s who was very knowledgeable, experienced and a long-running employee. I reckon it was mine as I have grown up and moved on.

It was a very grown-up tour as the first thing that became clear was money and natural light issues; strip lighting never makes for a good atmosphere. Right beside the cafe is an exhibition section which people can hire out. The much celebrated Cambridge Collection which is all about the history of Cambridge and its surroundings and includes old maps, communal archives and local documents, is independently looked after. There aren’t many librarians left; I think it was 25 throughout the entire county. They also seem to be keen to promote the library such as the scheme they have running in order to get children reading. If you have children, they will enjoy the bright yellow book train, the games and the toys. The quick picks section is also a good idea, if a nightmare for the librarians as it isn’t organised in the slightest. There are some nice snugs there and the window seat allows you to watch the world go by underneath. I can’t believe they didn’t organise their fiction books into categories at first. I really like their stickers; a gun for war, a magnifying glass for mystery, a heart for romance and so on.

However the way they organise the staff is exceptional. No one spends too much time in one place; they have a very colourful timetable; the floors are all colour-coded which makes finding things a lot easier, as well as locating where you are. There is a back office, but most of the employees work out at the desks on each floor. There is also a brilliant book sorting machine, complete with conveyor belt, which is attached to the book return slot next to the entrance. It uses RFID which I hate; those stickers are impossible to remove. The self-issue machines (in English and Polish) and information points (computers) are scattered throughout the library, and there is Wi-Fi access anywhere in the entire building. Unsurprisingly the VHS and CD sections are empty of people. This is not only due to the advent of DVDs, but also because there is the BFI film room where you can access local history films as well as watch movies.
Even though the new Central Library is superb, I still miss the old one, in the same way I miss the old Parkside pool and the old MGM cinema. To me however, the new library is not so enticing a place. The only comfortable areas are the quick picks, the children’s area and the BFI film room. I still remember the stuffy, velvety, worn, deep blue carpets of the old library, the dark wood shelving, the children’s play room with the round window, the ground floor entrance and the soothingly intimate lighting that only just gave you enough to see by. I could've easily spent the whole day there. But that’s just my nostalgia talking, as usual.

Flowers in the window

I feel very optimistic today and a Manic Street Preachers song is on my mp3 player, So Why So Sad, how ironic. It came on gradually, but it's built up so much that I now feel like dancing in the rain, going around hugging everyone and grinning so far from ear to ear, that I want to pass it on like Joker from Batman, without the fatal consequences of course. The main reason for my contentment is we've had stress management course today. I feel very relaxed, positive and in control. The Manic Street Preachers may be superb, especially You Stole the Sun from my Heart (I've hunted the song out on my mp3 player as the mere mention of it makes me want to listen to it), but the happiest song that always comes to my mind is Flowers in the Window by Travis. The story behind the writing of it is hilarious if not quite as happy; it features alcohol, drunk band members and a lonely Fran Healy. I'm thinking of it at the moment as I've just been on Youtube, enforced I might add by Cam23:



It may sum up my mood, act as shameless plugging for my favourite band and let me dwell on the 90's (again), but it also describes Youtube, look at the lyrics:

Wow look at you now
Flowers in the window
It's such a lovely day
And I'm glad you feel the same
Cause to stand up, out in the crowd
You are one in a million

Yes the single was actually released in 2003, but I'm trying not to be so pedantic; it's a symptom of stress for one and it's also just really annoying. The song lyrics are ironic when I think about them, because you are only one in a million on Youtube. All these people, all these videos, all these flowers in windows, it's overwhelming, but mostly overwhelmingly positive. These people simply want to connect. Although if you do become infamous because of it, like that poor lightsaber kid, it can be a curse as much as a promotional tool. Youtube is for watercoolers, a way of watching music videos, old comedy sketches and Jackass type antics. It's also a medium for indulging nostalgia, schadenfreude and fetishes. I've always been annoyed you can't download videos off of Youtube, but I've never had a blog I can embed them into before, this is brilliant!

Okay, this is why I don't go on Youtube. I clicked on a few of the Cam23 video links and then spent the next half an hour simply watching the suggestions that appear on the right-hand side. I barely watched the Lady Gaga video, was it intentionally that awful? Whose idea was that? And who thought to put it on Youtube? Americans have no shame. I found myself watching videos of Captain Kirk saying he should've been a librarian, Matthew Broderick singing a terrible librarian song and a Monty Python gorilla librarian sketch. The best one I found was the Cookie Monster in the library video, which someone's posted before. Sorry, I couldn't remember who.



I managed to refrain from delving into a Sesame Street nostalgia trip, somehow, even though I came across videos of my favourite character the Count. I managed to keep from looking up Muppets snippets as well, though I do have the Phenomenon video on my mp3 player.

Youtube may be separate from podcasts, but they are part of the same family; related but on the surface they seem to have totally different parents. Youtube is the equivalent of Bart Simpson, the "do what I feel like" kid: reckless, attention-seeking and brazen. Whereas podcasts are like Lisa Simpson: practical, informative and helpful with occasional moments of childishness. I am not speaking from experience as I have never watched or created a podcast, but I have been associated with them. The film magazines I avidly read advertise them; their writers always make them when they go to awards ceremonies, ComicCon and when they have something important to divulge. Podcasts are part of the Cambridge Film Festival, or they were when I did reviews for it, and I know my community radio station used to do them before they went bust as well. The station is back up and running now though, see. I'm afraid I refuse to use a Mac, iPods or iTunes or any Apple products on principle; I feel the same way about Apple as I do about facebook and Tesco. My views can be read here. There was a great recent episode of Futurama satirising web 2.0, Apple and the iPhone, or the eyephone as they called it:
I will definitely use Google docs, particularly when I do my presentation for TeachMeet. We've used it before at work for distributing timetables. I like the drawing function, but Paint is so much easier to use. I've just remembered, last Christmas, my brother set up a Google doc: a spreadsheet with each of our present lists on it. It was fantastic! We listed the things we wanted, their RRP, website links and everything. Then he added a column that was kept hidden where we put our names against the things that we wanted to get for each other so we didn't end up with two of the same thing. It worked really well and no one cheated and peeked, at least I didn't...

I've been very lax on the Calvin and Hobbes department and it's a particularly good one today.